![]() |
|
|
February 05, 2004
Judge Rules For Clarett
Just when Paul Tagliabue thought his week couldn't get any worse, it did: Ohio State running back Maurice Clarett was ruled eligible for the NFL draft Thursday by a federal judge who concluded that the league's rule violates antitrust laws. Wow. Here's an excerpt from the judge's ruling: The league had argued that Clarett should not be eligible because its rule resulted from a collective bargaining agreement with the players and is immune from antitrust scrutiny. The NFL also argued that its rule is reasonable and that Clarett cannot bring such a lawsuit. Here's Skip Oliva on the decision: It’s always a sad day when a federal judge decides what “enhances competition” in the private sector. I just heard comments on the Clarett decision on ESPN Radio where Tony Kornheiser and Andy Pollin—two men who have no concept of what this country is about—lauded the ruling as an obvious remedy for Clarett’s injustice. Kornheiser said the judge upheld Clarett’s “civil rights”—as if the men who died at Yorktown, Gettysburg, and Iwo Jima gave their lives so Maurice Clarett could force the NFL to hire him against its will. Judge Sheindlin says it's wrong for the NFL to make a blanket assumption that all players below a certain age are incapable of playing in the league. She suggested there were "less restrictive" alternatives for individually assessing players. But that's not the point. The issue is whether the NFL can decide for itself what employment policies to maintain, or whether the league's business judgment can be arbitrarily second-guessed by a federal judge. More later. . . UPDATE: ESPN.com's SportsNation held a live chat on the decision. Fox Sports has posted reactions from a variety of their readers, including this one: I believe that an individual has a right to earn a living. If a NFL team does not feel that Maurice Clarett is ready to play in the NFL, (follow) my suggestion: Do not draft him. And if that were to happen, we'd have another lawsuit, except this time the charge would be collusion. Pitt wideout Larry Fitzgerald, who was given a special waiver to become eligible for the 2004 Draft, isn't saying anything. Here's the official response from the NCAA: "From an education perspective, we are disappointed with the decision," NCAA spokeswoman Kay Hawes said. "It is too early to know how or how soon this will affect college football, but it clearly opens the door to more football student-athletes leaving college early and without degrees." From an education perspective? Since when does big time college football have anything to do with education? From a business perspective, the decision is a disaster for both the NFL and the NCAA. Recruiting becomes that much more vicious, as college football coaches have to deal with the same reality as their counterparts in basketball -- the best kids just aren't going to hang around. As for the NFL, their relationship with their free developmental league (the NCAA) is now under attack, and teams will probably have to pay a number of players high salaries just to sit on the bench while teams wait for them to mature. One last thought: today's decision is going to be appealed. By no means is this story over. But at the end of the day, the NFL and the NCAA have nobody to blame but themselves. Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Judge Rules For Clarett:
» Clarett Ruled Eligible from selling waves Tracked on February 6, 2004 11:04 AM |