![]() |
|
|
June 08, 2006
Stanley Cup Finals Notebook
Carolina 5 Edmonton 0: The Carolina Hurricanes moved one step closer to securing their first Stanley Cup with a convincing victory over a seemingly overmatched Oilers squad. Rookie goalie Cam Ward had 25 saves, and five different Carolina players scored, with rookie winger Andrew Ladd getting the game winner in the first period. On the other side of the ledger, Jussi Markkanen, pressed into service after Dwayne Roloson's injury and Ty Conklin's brain fart, played better than the stats would indicate, yielding the five Carolina goals on just 25 shots. But more often than not, the Finn was left hung out to dry by his Edmonton teammates. Covered in Oil liveblogged the pain last night, while Sacamano at Battle of Alberta is just looking to kick some butt: They tried to be too cute instead of just shooting the damn puck at a goalie who was giving out rebounds like a trampoline. They took idiotic penalties. They gave up odd-man rushes on stupid pinches. They refused to direct anything towards the net on powerplays. At least Hemsky looked good. Mudcrutch is still puzzling over the shot count and outcome of Game One: Looking at some of the Canes blogs, they seem satisfied that their team picked it up in the third of G1. Casonblog is an example of this; he says "The Oilers were clearly the better team last night...until they weren't", whatever the hell that means. Comments from their players seem to indicate the same. From what I know of the Oilogosphere, I don't think that the reaction to a win like that would be quite so positive. He also goes back to the well with the old saw about how the Canes are only winning because every other team is suffering major injuries, and makes sure he takes a couple of shots at the Cainiacs for not knowing their hockey. People, can't we all just get along? In other Oilers blogs, Andy Grabia needs some Prozac, Lain Babcock is holding out hope and BDH says the Oilers have no margin for error. Meanwhile, back in Raleigh, Red and Black Hockey has the offical B-List celebrity sighting list from last night's game: Kid Rock Carolina Panthers wide recievers Steve Smith and Ricky Proehl ESPN's Chris Berman Mia Hamm. When your team is up 2-0 in the Finals you can get away with worrying about stuff like this. The Acid Queen says it's no time for Canes fans to get haughty, and CasonBlog wanted some retaliation after Georges Laraque got a little punchy: Seriously, that crap out of Dredy Locks Laraque was absolute thuggery. He takes a run at Wallin's legs then boards Andrew Ladd when the boy's head is down. And the Canes take it? You're up five goals and nobody takes a shot at Moreau? That's the only bittersweet thing about tonight for me. The Canes played the game right start to finish. They blocked shots, played great team defense, created great shot opportunities, Cam was the man, and they kept their discipline...too much friggin' discipline. One thing that drove me nuts last night: Once it was clear the game was getting out of hand and the Oilers started to play a little chippy, OLN color man John Davidson (apparently heading for St. Louis soon enough) kept saying that Edmonton was playing "nasty". And he kep repeating it in such a way that it seemed like he couldn't reboot his brain, like he was searching desperately for another word and couldn't find it. So when that failed, he resorted to pronouncing the word with a flourish, as if we wouldn't notice he was saying the same thing over and over again. I almost put my foot through my television. Now we've got a pair of off days until Game Three on Saturday night in Edmonton, as the NHL makes its triumphant return to network prime time in the U.S. Bob Eckstrom has a message for NHL fans in the U.S.: Yours can no longer afford to remain a secret order dedicated to preserving the esoterica of a once sacred game. You must come to terms with the fact that 'Bowling Night' successfully replaced your sport on its former network, and the WNBA now outdraws it on its new home on OLN. Your game's next generation of fans are more apt to be the fallout who dosed off during 'Elk Country Journal' or 'The Lance Chronicles' and awaken to a hockey game and a missing remote. That is not a sufficient source to carry you back into prime time. Blah, blah, blah. Since when is it the responsibility of NHL fans to bail the league out of its difficulties? If you like the game, please feel free to watch. And if not, just please leave us alone. Carolina leads series, 2-0. Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: Comments"If you like the game, please feel free to watch. And if not, just please leave us alone." Amen to that. Posted by:
Sigh. The comment about Canes fans not knowing their hockey really was tongue in cheek-one of the things I like about blogs as opposed to message boards is that there's a barrier to entry-you have to really have something to say or an entertaining way of doing it before people will bother coming to your site. If your blog survives, it's probably because a) you know what you're talking about or b) you're a witty writer. I just thought that it was hilarious that of all the players he could have picked to make the point that MLSE staff wouldn't recognize their in-laws, he picks the guy who's brother in law is Shayne Corson. Posted by:
The thing about mc79, is that we (Hurricanes fans, and I am the other fan you noted in your entry) hear it all the time, and all too many mean it when they say it. That and we do not deserve a team (despite drawing more fans than ever this year) that we are dumb rednecks (despite having the second highest education level per capita in the country, etc etc) Are Canes fans too sensitive? Probably. But after you get sandpapered over and over with the same tired cliches you get a little combatative. That Red and Black didn't know about Shane Corson is a bit surprising, but what's also surprising is that you apparently do not realize that here in the southern US "in-laws" almost always means parents-in-law. You made an assumption based on an incorrect interpretation of another region's dialect, even if it was not readily apparent. Posted by:
I'm not going to get into an argument over the meaning of in-laws. If you're a Canadian reading that, it's a funny statement. As for Carolina fans persecution complex-get over yourselves already. I'm a pretty thorough reader of the Oilogosphere and there's been no bashing of Carolina or it's fans, up until some of those fans started showing up on blogs post G2. 99% of the NASCAR and "hockey retards" comments I've seen have come from Carolina fans, who apparently spend their spare time lying on the ground in the fetal position as they compose tremulous blog posts about how they really don't like NASCAR and they know stuff about hockey. I assume that you're the Chuck guy-go back and take a look at my site and see how NASCAR came up-I was responding to AQ's absurd contention that Sportsnet was going to pre-empt a Leafs game for a NASCAR race. In any event, you guys would be well served to stop crying about how people are mean and give your fanbase no respect when nothing negative has been said about your fanbase. The only one bringing it up in this series is you guys-I, and virtually everyone else cheering for the Oilers really don't care about how many hockey fans there are in Carolina or how much they know about the game; it has nothing to do with who will win the Cup. Posted by:
Post a commentThanks for signing in, . (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) |