Off Wing Opinion
Off Wing Opinion


May 11, 2005

In The Interests Of Full Disclosure


From the stifled yawn file:

In a survey of 285 newspapers, about 43 percent of sports editors agreed that accepting such "freebies" didn't affect reporters' objectivity, said Marie Hardin, an assistant professor at the Center for Sports Journalism at Penn State.

"A lot of sports journalists don't see the harm in them because they don't see it as changing the story," Hardin said Wednesday.

But, she added, accepting meals and other items could affect a reporter's relationship with a source -- or at least the impression of the relationship with a source -- in stories beyond game coverage. She cited the ongoing story of the use of steroids in sports as examples of sports coverage becoming more complex.

Just in case any of you didn't already know, I can be bought.



Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.ericmcerlain.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4722

Comments

No, no, meal freebies do not do anything to influence a story. In fact, they are mostly just taken for granted by the beat guys who have had them for the last twenty-odd years.

The real thing I didn't like in that article: It also found that 39 percent of editors reached in the survey agreed with the statement that sports coverage "should boost the home team."

Wow. That is just plain awful.

Posted by: [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 12, 2005 09:36 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, .

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)