|
 |
|
|
November 01, 2005
Eklund Followup
Toronto Star reporter Christopher Hutsul, the reporter who wrote a piece on Eklund for yesterday's paper, sent me a note responding to my Monday post that took his article to task: My apologies for not attributing the "who is eklund and why is he blogging" quote to your site... I was under the impression that that very phrase was somewhat ubiquitous. Thanks for calling me on it. As I said to Hutsul in an email response, apology accepted. And it's to his credit that he responded at all, something many reporters (but not all) wouldn't ever think of doing. In the end, it wouldn't have been terribly hard to edit this piece. Just embed a few links to folks who have debunked Eklund and there wouldn't have been a problem. If you're concerned about anonymity, just follow up with the blogger by email to confirm an identity. As always, click here for my ever-expanding Eklund file.
Eric
12:43 PM
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsPost a commentThanks for signing in, . (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) |